Is This An Artist Statement?

I guess. Maybe. Why not?

A very long time ago, one of my buddies said:
Whereever there is number, there is beauty.
--Proclus
Okay, it would be a stretch to say Proclus is a buddy since he lived between 412 and 485 AD. But, he had an aesthetic appreciation for numbers, so I feel a kinship. Unlike him, I'm not a mathematician. I just happen to appreciate the beauty in numbers.

The fun is in translating numbers into pictures. That's where generative art comes in.  The world of generative art is alive and well today.  And while I consider myself to be a generative artist, I'll leave it to the reader to google the term generative art.

Instead, I'll quote Jason Bailey, an art historian whose writings I admire:
... I see a clear line of influence on generative art starting from Cézanne and shooting straight through to the:
  • Fracturing of geometry in Analytical Cubism
  • Emphasis on technology, machine aesthetic, and mechanized production from Futurism, Constructivism, and the Bauhaus
  • Introduction of autonomy and chance in Dada, Surrealism, Abstract Expressionism
  • Anti-figurative aesthetic, bold geometry, and intense color of Neoplasticism, Suprematism, Hard-edged Abstraction, and OpArt
  • Use of algorithms by Sol Lewitt and others
In my case, I am motivated by the process of discovery that involves learning about mathematical concepts, investigating possibilities for visualizing those concepts, programming a computer to "plot" the data, reiterating and fine-tuning the results. I rarely know what the final image is going to look like since randomness is a major characteristic of generative art. I am often surprised and astounded by what comes out of a jumble of code and numbers. I am truly amazed by and delighted with, the range of images that are possible in this medium.

Why make art this way? This is 2019. I want to use all the tools available today to express myself creatively. Adding my laptop just made my palette huge.